Modern QA2026Why Docs-as-Code — tiles
Log inJoin
35 / 51 · 24 Technical Writing for QA · Documentation as Code← prev⊞ allnext →☰ Read as one page

5.2Why Docs-as-Code

Traditional documentation tools (Google Docs, Confluence, SharePoint) have a fundamental problem: they are disconnected from the codebase. When the code changes, the documentation does not automatically update. Nobody notices when a wiki page becomes inaccurate. There is no review process to catch errors. There is no version history that correlates with code changes.

Traditional Docs Docs-as-Code
Stored in a wiki or shared drive Stored in a Git repository alongside code
Edited through a web UI Edited in a text editor or IDE
No review process Pull request reviews, same as code
Version history is buried Git history shows every change with context
No CI/CD Automated builds, link checking, spell checking
Disconnected from code changes Documentation changes in the same PR as code changes
Formatting varies wildly Consistent formatting through linters and templates
Difficult to search across repos Standard text files are searchable with any tool