Modern QA2026Trunk-Based Development in Detail — tiles
Log inJoin
5 / 57 · 17 Git & Version Control · Branching Strategies← prev⊞ allnext →☰ Read as one page

1.5Trunk-Based Development in Detail

Trunk-based development takes GitHub Flow to its extreme. Feature branches live less than a day. Developers commit to main frequently, often multiple times per day.

main ──●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●● (continuous stream of small commits)
       ↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑↑
       Very short-lived branches (hours, not days)

QA Implications for Trunk-Based Development

  • Every commit must pass all tests: There is no stabilization period. The pipeline must be fast and reliable.
  • Feature flags replace feature branches: Incomplete features are deployed behind flags, not on separate branches
  • Testing shifts left dramatically: QA reviews requirements and writes tests before development starts, because there is no time to catch up later
  • Flaky tests are existential threats: A flaky test that blocks main blocks the entire team. Fix flaky tests immediately.

When trunk-based development works:

  • The team has high test automation maturity (>90% of tests automated)
  • CI pipeline completes in under 10 minutes
  • Feature flags are available and well-managed
  • The team has strong code review discipline