66 / 70 · 07 Security Testing for AI Apps · Building a Comprehensive AI Security Testing Program← prev⊞ allnext →☰ Read as one page
11.3Building the Program: A Phased Approach
Phase 1: Foundation (Month 1-2)
Goal: Establish automated security gates in CI.
- Add Semgrep with AI-specific rules to the CI pipeline
- Enable Snyk/Dependabot for ML dependency scanning
- Configure GitLeaks for secret detection
- Write initial prompt injection test suite (10-20 payloads)
- Deploy PII scanner on LLM responses in staging
Exit criteria: Every PR is scanned for AI security patterns. Basic injection tests run on every deployment.
Phase 2: Expansion (Month 3-4)
Goal: Comprehensive automated security testing.
- Expand prompt injection suite to 50+ payloads (direct + indirect)
- Build jailbreak test framework with categorized test cases
- Add data leakage scanner (PII, system prompt, cross-session)
- Add RAG security tests (if using RAG)
- Configure OWASP ZAP for DAST scans against staging
- Write AI-specific Semgrep rules for your codebase
Exit criteria: All OWASP LLM Top 10 items have corresponding automated tests.
Phase 3: Maturity (Month 5-6)
Goal: Production monitoring and adversarial testing.
- Deploy real-time PII scanner on production LLM responses
- Build anomaly detection for unusual query patterns
- Conduct first red team exercise
- Complete threat model for all AI features
- Implement compliance test suite (EU AI Act / NIST AI RMF)
- Run first bias and fairness assessment
Exit criteria: Production monitoring catches issues missed by pre-production tests. Compliance requirements are verified automatically.
Phase 4: Continuous Improvement (Ongoing)
Goal: Evolving defense that matches the evolving threat landscape.
- Update jailbreak payloads weekly based on new research
- Review security metrics monthly
- Conduct red team exercises quarterly
- Update threat models when features change
- Track and respond to new ML library CVEs within SLA
- Publish internal security posture report quarterly